Synonyms Endoscopic
Retrograde Cannulation of Ampulla of Vater; Endoscopic Retrograde Cannulation of Pancreas;
Endoscopic Retrograde Cannulation of Papilla of Vater; ERCP
Applies to Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD); Percutaneous
Transhepatic Cholangiogram (PTC)
Procedure Commonly Includes Endoscopic
visualization of the duodenum and papilla of vater, followed by radiologic assessment of
the pancreatic duct and biliary tree. Procedure is performed on a conscious, but sedated
patient. A specialized fiberoptic endoscope is introduced by mouth and advanced through
the upper GI tract until the second portion of the duodenum is reached. Under direct
visualization the papilla of vater is located and inspected. A small catheter is then
advanced through the papilla of vater and into the pancreatic and biliary duct systems,
all under fluoroscopic guidance. Contrast material is injected through the catheter,
outlining the pancreatic duct (pancreatogram) and biliary ducts (cholangiogram). Forceps
biopsies or cytologic brushings of the periampullary region and ducts may be taken.
Endoscopically-guided therapeutic procedures are also possible, including endoscopic
sphincterotomy and dissolution of stones. ERCP is a safe, nonsurgical means of assessing
the anatomy of the ductal system and is successful in 80% to 90% of attempts.
Indications ERCP has emerged as a widely accepted,
standard technique for diagnosing a variety of pancreaticobiliary tract disorders.
However, several noninvasive radiologic procedures are also effective in diagnosing these
disorders, including percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), CT scan of the
abdomen, ultrasound of the abdomen, and the radionuclide liver-spleen scan. These imaging
techniques should be considered complementary (not competitive) with ERCP. The precise
sequencing of studies must be individualized in each case, but generally the high-risk
procedures (ERCP, PTC) are reserved for last. With these considerations in mind, the
American Society for Gastroenterology (1986) published suggested guidelines for ERCP as
follows:1
|
evaluation of the patient with persistent jaundice in whom biliary obstruction is
suspected (from retained stones, strictures, malignancy, etc)
|
|
evaluation of the nonjaundiced patient with suspected biliary tract disease, either
intrahepatic or extrahepatic
|
|
evaluation of the patient with signs or symptoms compatible with pancreatic cancer, when
prior imaging studies (CT scan or ultrasound) are normal or equivocal
|
|
evaluation of recurrent pancreatitis of unknown etiology
|
|
diagnosis of pancreatic pseudocyst suspected on clinical grounds, when CT scan and/or
ultrasound are normal or equivocal
|
|
preoperative evaluation of a known pancreatic pseudocyst, known chronic pancreatitis, or
pancreatic trauma prior to surgical repair or endoscopic therapy
|
ERCP may also be useful in:
|
manometric study of the sphincter of Oddi (see listing)
|
|
follow-up evaluation of endoscopic sphincterotomy or other relatively high-risk
therapeutic procedures
|
|
follow-up evaluation of nondiagnostic PTC studies
|
|
situations where PTC is contraindicated (eg, severe coagulopathy)
|
ERCP is less useful in the following situations:2
|
suspected gallbladder disease without evidence of bile duct abnormalities
|
|
pancreatic cancer diagnosed clearly by CT scan
|
Therapeutic application of ERCP includes:
|
endoscopic papillotomy for retained common duct stones, usually <1 cm diameter, to
facilitate passage into the duodenum
|
|
endoscopic sphincterotomy (using a sphincterotome) for retained common duct stones in the
following situations: patients who have had their gallbladder removed (procedure of
choice), patients who are poor surgical candidates and gallbladder is present; less
commonly, endoscopic sphincterotomy may be indicated for papillary stenosis or the
"sump syndrome"
|
|
endoscopic extraction of retained stones from biliary or pancreatic ducts using a basket,
snare, etc
|
|
endoscopic placement of plastic stents or nasobiliary drainage tubes across biliary
strictures
|
|
balloon dilatations of biliary strictures
|
|
laser
ablation or fulguration of obstructing tumor
|
Contraindications
|
patient refusal or poor cooperation
|
|
recent attack of acute pancreatitis, within the past several weeks; one exception is the
patient with known choledocholithiasis who will be undergoing endoscopic sphincterotomy or
surgery
|
|
recent myocardial infarction
|
|
inadequate surgical back-up
|
|
history of contrast dye anaphylaxis
|
Relative contraindications include:
|
poor
surgical candidacy; in general patients should be able to tolerate laparotomy if
complications arise
|
|
pseudocyst, due to an increased risk of infection (this has been debated)
|
|
ascites
|
|
severe cardiopulmonary background disease
|
|
overlying residual barium in the GI tract from recent abdominal CT scan, lower GI series,
etc
|
Patient Preparation Technique and potential
complications of the procedure are discussed with the patient. Informed consent is
obtained for ERCP, including likely therapeutic interventions. Formal consultation with
gastroenterology staff is required prior to approval and scheduling. Patient is informed
whether overnight hospitalization is necessary (most cases) or whether "same
day" outpatient ERCP is feasible. On the day prior to the procedure, inpatient
candidates are routinely seen by the endoscopist (or his representative) to briefly
examine the patient, review details of the case, write orders, and answer remaining
patient questions. Patient is made NPO after midnight (or at least 8 hours prior to
study). Daily oral medications are permitted on the morning of ERCP with physician
approval. Exceptions include antacids and CarafateŽ which may interfere with
visualization of the mucosa. Aspirin products and nonsteroidal agents must be discontinued
well in advance (at least 5 days for aspirin), especially if biopsy or
sphincterotomy/papillotomy is anticipated. For hospital inpatients, dentures are removed
and patient is transported to endoscopy suite on cart, accompanied by medical chart and
relevant x-rays. For outpatients, procedure is the same except that transportation home
must be arranged in advance if a "same day" procedure (driving not permitted due
to sedative effects). Once patient is in the procedure room, baseline vital signs are
recorded and an intravenous line started. Antibiotic prophylaxis may be given at this time
(see Special Instructions). Premedications are routinely given including parenteral
meperidine, diazepam, and often atropine (0.4 mg). A topical anesthetic agent such as
CetacaineŽ spray is applied to the pharynx.
Aftercare The patient is placed at strict bedrest and
observed carefully in the recovery area. Vital signs are monitored frequently and
physician contacted if any complications arise. If the patient has tolerated the procedure
well, he may be discharged from the testing area once sedatives have worn off. NPO until
gag reflux has returned, then clear liquids for 24 hours. Any patient undergoing a
therapeutic procedure should be observed overnight in the hospital. If a "same
day" outpatient procedure (not allowed in all institutions), patient must have ready
access to the hospital emergency room should complications develop.
Special Instructions Prior to ERCP, if bile duct
obstruction is suspected, antibiotic coverage is usually indicated. If high grade bile
duct or pancreatic duct obstruction is confirmed during ERCP, antibiotics should be
continued (or begun). Individuals at risk for infective endocarditis are often given
antibiotic prophylaxis prior to ERCP, particularly if a therapeutic maneuver such as
sphincterotomy is planned. High risk cardiac lesions include rheumatic valvular disease,
prosthetic valves, and prior endocarditis. However, ERCP is considered a relatively low
risk procedure for the development of endocarditis, in comparison with invasive dental
procedures and genitourinary tract instrumentation. Some authorities feel that
prophylactic antibiotics are not warranted. A controlled clinical trial to answer this
question is unlikely and liberal use of prophylactic antibiotics will probably continue.
Complications In the hands of a skilled endoscopist,
diagnostic ERCP is associated with a 3% incidence of morbidity and 0.2% mortality, based
on nationwide statistics.3 Complication rate is considerably higher with an
inexperienced endoscopist. If endoscopic sphincterotomy or papillotomy is performed,
overall morbidity rate increases to 8% and mortality 1% to 1.5%. Emergent surgical repair
is necessary in 2%; it should be noted that these figures are superior to those documented
for elective surgical exploration of the common bile duct.
Complications of ERCP may be classified as follows.
|
Painless hyperamylasemia: May occur in 75%
of cases with sometimes striking elevations of serum and urine amylase levels. This is not
accompanied by abdominal pain, nausea, or other stigmata of pancreatitis and is clinically
inconsequential. Within 4 days, amylase decreases to normal without treatment.
|
|
Acute
pancreatitis: Develops in 0.7% to 7.4% of cases and represents a small fraction of
patients with elevated amylase levels. Pathogenesis is unclear. Implicated factors include
the type of contrast used, the rate and volume of injection, the underlying condition of
the pancreas, and the experience of the endoscopist. Management is the same as for
gallstone or alcoholic pancreatitis.
|
|
Sepsis: A rare complication but associated with a high mortality. The incidence of
bacteremia has been variously estimated at 0% to 14%. Both cholangitis (incidence of 0.65%
to 0.8%) and pancreatic sepsis (0.3% incidence) have been reported. The former is almost
exclusively associated with ductal obstruction. Biliary stasis predisposes patients to
infection of bile fluid, and gram-negative bacteria probably remain dormant behind the
obstruction until ERCP. Pancreatic sepsis appears more likely if a pseudocyst is present.
Injection of nonsterile contrast into the pseudocyst may lead to abscess if drainage is
sluggish. Some authorities consider the presence of pseudocyst a contraindication to ERCP
but others feel the statistical risk is unproven.
|
|
Complications of upper endoscopy: Nonspecific complications common with upper
gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD) (see listing) including esophageal perforation, hypoxia,
adverse drug reactions, arrhythmias. Drug toxicity may play a more significant role with
ERCP due to lengthier procedure time requiring multiple drug administrations.
|
|
Instrumental injury: Uncommon with diagnostic ERCP alone unless anatomy is surgically
distorted. Common therapeutic injuries are hemorrhage, laceration, and perforation.
|
Equipment The duodenoscope used for ERCP is similar to the
fiberoptic endoscope used for EGD with several modifications. The viewing lens and light
window at the instrument tip are arranged for side viewing. Within the duodenoscope is a
channel which can accommodate a polyethylene contrast-filled catheter, which can be
advanced past the tip of the instrument; this separate catheter is used for cannulating
the papilla of vater. Other devices may be passed through the endoscope including biopsy
forceps, electrocautery devices, sphincterotome, cytology brush, etc. A teaching head may
be used for additional viewing or the endoscopic images may be videotaped on a television
monitor.
Technique ERCP is performed with the patient on an x-ray
table with radiologic equipment and fluoroscopy at hand. Following premedication the
patient is placed in the left lateral decubitus position. The duodenoscope is passed by
mouth through the anesthetized pharynx, and into the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum. A
rapid visual examination of these segments may be made. Once the instrument has reached
the second (descending) portion of the duodenum, the ampulla of vater is located, often on
the medial wall. The periampullary region is carefully inspected. Often glucagon is given
(0.2 mL doses) to decrease duodenal motility and facilitate visualization. The inner
catheter (containing contrast dye) is then advanced from the lateral port of the endoscope
and guided into the orifice. Once the ampulla has been engaged, the catheter is advanced
several millimeters into the duct and a small volume of contrast injected. The dye filling
pattern is observed under fluoroscopy ("the test shot") to determine
orientation. In this manner the pancreatic duct and the bile duct may be selectively
cannulated and imaged separately with contrast. Fluoroscopy is used as needed to assure
proper catheter orientation. Formal spot radiographs are taken of contrast-filled ducts
for the permanent record. At times x-ray table adjustments and patient repositioning may
be necessary particularly if the gallbladder is imaged. Delayed films are also obtained
following removal of the duodenoscope since contrast material normally remains in the
ductal system for minutes. In addition, suspicious periampullary or ductal lesions may be
biopsied and cytologic brush samples obtained. "Blind" biopsies of the ducts
and/or pancreas may be taken at physician discretion. A variety of therapeutic procedures,
mentioned earlier, may be performed.
Specimen Biopsy specimens and cytologic brushings are placed
in appropriate containers and fixatives and sent to pathology laboratory without delay.
Tissue for Gram's stain and culture is placed in a sterile jar without fixative and hand
carried to the Microbiology Laboratory. Details of specimen collection, fixative, and
transportation are handled by the gastroenterology team.
Turnaround Time Final report on biopsy and cytology
specimen histology is given within 2-3 days (or longer in some cases).
Normal Findings Preliminary written report on
endoscopic and radiologic findings immediately completed by gastroenterology staff. Final
typewritten report is added to the chart in several days. A "normal
cholangiogram" implies a normal radiographic appearance of the following structures:
common bile duct (CBD), common hepatic duct, left and right hepatic duct (and
subdivisions), cystic duct, and gallbladder. Maximum diameter of the normal CBD is
approximately 9 mm (range 4-9 mm) providing the gallbladder is present. If the patient has
had prior cholecystectomy, diameters may be somewhat increased. The CBD normally will have
a tapered appearance at its distal end, the so-called "vaterian segment" where
it is surrounded by the papilla and sphincter of Oddi. A "normal pancreatogram"
implies a smooth, patent main pancreatic duct which gradually tapers from the body
(diameter 3.4 mm) to the tail (1.7 mm). With optimal filling of the pancreatic duct,
approximately 15-30 secondary branches will be outlined with contrast. These are straight
in appearance and of fine caliber. There is variability in the anatomy of the pancreatic
ducts. For example, the duct of Santorini is present in 80% of normal individuals and its
communication with the duodenum or main pancreatic duct is variable.
Critical Values In formulating the diagnostic
impression, information is obtained from three sources: direct visual examination,
radiologic imaging, and biopsy specimens. Endoscopic examination of the papilla of vater
may reveal a mucosal mass if carcinoma of the pancreatic head is present. Other
malignancies may involve this region including ampullary carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma,
and rarely duodenal cancers. The endoscopic appearance of the papilla may be highly
suggestive in other disease states, such as papilla "bulging" (possible impacted
stone), edema, erythema, and patency (recently passed stone), visible purulent drainage
(suppurative cholangitis), bright red blood through the orifice (hemobilia). Radiologic
abnormalities in the cholangiogram may be specific and diagnostic. Certainly, retained
stones in the common bile duct are easily recognized by discrete filling defects. Other
deviations include biliary strictures, irregular filling defects or mass lesions beyond
endoscopic visualization (carcinoma), ductal dilatation (obstruction of any cause),
irregular intrahepatic ducts with strictures and ectasia (sclerosing cholangitis), cystic
duct narrowing with cholelithiasis (acute cholecystitis). The pancreatogram may reveal
congenital abnormalities (such as pancreas divisum), small pancreatic pseudocysts (not
seen on CT scan), and pancreatic duct calculi. The radiologic appearance of carcinoma of
the pancreas includes:
|
single, irregular abrupt stricture of the pancreatic duct (probably the best criteria4)
|
|
gradual occlusion of the main duct
|
|
alterations in the side branches near the tumor such as fragmentation and cystic
destruction
|
|
displacement of Wirsung's duct
|
|
pooled contrast material in an irregular manner (within necrotic tumor)
|
|
strictured CBD and pancreatic duct ("double duct" sign)
|
The radiologic appearance of chronic pancreatitis may closely resemble
pancreatic cancer. However, the main pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis is
classically irregular, tortuous, and with multiple stenoses - the "chain of
lakes" appearance. Single smooth stenosis is also more consistent with chronic
pancreatitis.4 The yield of biopsy in pancreatic cancer is >90% in most
large series. Nearly all pancreatic malignancies are ductal carcinomas; thus even small
lesions are likely to cause stenosis or occlusion of the main pancreatic duct. In cases
where tumor invades the pancreatic duct region or ampulla without entering the lumen,
cytology specimens of pancreatic juice may be diagnostic.
Limitations ERCP is relatively expensive and hazardous in
comparison with other endoscopic procedures. Results are highly operator dependent, as
demonstrated in large series. For both physician and patient there may be nontrivial
radiation exposure if fluoroscopy time is prolonged. This procedure is technically
difficult, particularly in patients who have had a Billroth II gastrectomy and
gastrojejunostomy.
Footnotes
|
1. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,
Utilization Committee, Appropriate Use of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Manchester,
MA: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1986. |
|
2. Vennes JA, "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,"Cecil
Textbook of Medicine, 18th ed, Chapter 96, Wyngaarden JB and Smith LH, eds,
Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co, 1988, 668-74. |
|
3. Shahmir M and Schuman BM, "Complications of
Fiberoptic Endoscopy,"Gastrointest Endosc, 1980, 26:86-91. |
|
4. Cello JP, "Carcinoma of the Pancreas,"Gastrointestinal
Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, 4th ed, Chapter 99, Sleisenger MH and
Fordtran JS, eds, Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co, 1989, 1872-80. |
References
|
Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, et al, "Complications
of ERCP: A Study of 10,000 Cases,"Gastroenterology, 1976, 70:314-20. |
|
Dutta SK, Cox M, Williams RB, et al, "Prospective
Evaluation of the Risk of Bacteremia and the Role of Antibiotics in ERCP,"J Clin
Gastroenterol, 1983, 5:325-9. |
|
Geenen JE and Venu RP, "Endoscopic Retrograde
Cholangiopancreatography,"Bockus Gastroenterology, 4th ed, Chapter 44, Berk
JE, ed, Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co, 1985, 601-11. |
|
Sivak MV and Sullivan BH, "Endoscopic Retrograde
Pancreatography: Analysis of the Normal Pancreatogram,"Am J Dig Dis, 1976,
21:263-9. |
|
Stewart ET, Vennes JA, and Geenen JE, Atlas of
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, St Louis, MO: CV Mosby Co, 1977. |
|
Venu RP, Geenen JE, Toouli J, et al, "Endoscopic
Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Diagnosis of Cholelithiasis in Patients With Normal
Gallbladder X-ray and Ultrasound Studies,"JAMA, 1983, 249:758-61.
Back to the articles... |
|