Sections
Colonoscopy
Gastroscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Laser Treatment
Medical Articles
Procedure Images
Questions/Answers
Checkup Calendar
Up to date News
Health Quiz
Medical Records
History Form
Get some Help
Disclaimer*
Home (Main page)

Back to the articles...

Synonyms Endoscopic Retrograde Cannulation of Ampulla of Vater; Endoscopic Retrograde Cannulation of Pancreas; Endoscopic Retrograde Cannulation of Papilla of Vater; ERCP

Applies to Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD); Percutaneous Transhepatic Cholangiogram (PTC)

Procedure Commonly Includes Endoscopic visualization of the duodenum and papilla of vater, followed by radiologic assessment of the pancreatic duct and biliary tree. Procedure is performed on a conscious, but sedated patient. A specialized fiberoptic endoscope is introduced by mouth and advanced through the upper GI tract until the second portion of the duodenum is reached. Under direct visualization the papilla of vater is located and inspected. A small catheter is then advanced through the papilla of vater and into the pancreatic and biliary duct systems, all under fluoroscopic guidance. Contrast material is injected through the catheter, outlining the pancreatic duct (pancreatogram) and biliary ducts (cholangiogram). Forceps biopsies or cytologic brushings of the periampullary region and ducts may be taken. Endoscopically-guided therapeutic procedures are also possible, including endoscopic sphincterotomy and dissolution of stones. ERCP is a safe, nonsurgical means of assessing the anatomy of the ductal system and is successful in 80% to 90% of attempts.

Indications ERCP has emerged as a widely accepted, standard technique for diagnosing a variety of pancreaticobiliary tract disorders. However, several noninvasive radiologic procedures are also effective in diagnosing these disorders, including percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), CT scan of the abdomen, ultrasound of the abdomen, and the radionuclide liver-spleen scan. These imaging techniques should be considered complementary (not competitive) with ERCP. The precise sequencing of studies must be individualized in each case, but generally the high-risk procedures (ERCP, PTC) are reserved for last. With these considerations in mind, the American Society for Gastroenterology (1986) published suggested guidelines for ERCP as follows:1

bull evaluation of the patient with persistent jaundice in whom biliary obstruction is suspected (from retained stones, strictures, malignancy, etc)

bull evaluation of the nonjaundiced patient with suspected biliary tract disease, either intrahepatic or extrahepatic

bull evaluation of the patient with signs or symptoms compatible with pancreatic cancer, when prior imaging studies (CT scan or ultrasound) are normal or equivocal

bull evaluation of recurrent pancreatitis of unknown etiology

bull diagnosis of pancreatic pseudocyst suspected on clinical grounds, when CT scan and/or ultrasound are normal or equivocal

bull preoperative evaluation of a known pancreatic pseudocyst, known chronic pancreatitis, or pancreatic trauma prior to surgical repair or endoscopic therapy

ERCP may also be useful in:

bull manometric study of the sphincter of Oddi (see listing)

bull follow-up evaluation of endoscopic sphincterotomy or other relatively high-risk therapeutic procedures

bull follow-up evaluation of nondiagnostic PTC studies

bull situations where PTC is contraindicated (eg, severe coagulopathy)

ERCP is less useful in the following situations:2

bull suspected gallbladder disease without evidence of bile duct abnormalities

bull pancreatic cancer diagnosed clearly by CT scan

Therapeutic application of ERCP includes:

bull endoscopic papillotomy for retained common duct stones, usually <1 cm diameter, to facilitate passage into the duodenum

bull endoscopic sphincterotomy (using a sphincterotome) for retained common duct stones in the following situations: patients who have had their gallbladder removed (procedure of choice), patients who are poor surgical candidates and gallbladder is present; less commonly, endoscopic sphincterotomy may be indicated for papillary stenosis or the "sump syndrome"

bull endoscopic extraction of retained stones from biliary or pancreatic ducts using a basket, snare, etc

bull endoscopic placement of plastic stents or nasobiliary drainage tubes across biliary strictures

bull balloon dilatations of biliary strictures

bull laser ablation or fulguration of obstructing tumor



Contraindications

bull patient refusal or poor cooperation

bull recent attack of acute pancreatitis, within the past several weeks; one exception is the patient with known choledocholithiasis who will be undergoing endoscopic sphincterotomy or surgery

bull recent myocardial infarction

bull inadequate surgical back-up

bull history of contrast dye anaphylaxis

Relative contraindications include:

bull poor surgical candidacy; in general patients should be able to tolerate laparotomy if complications arise

bull pseudocyst, due to an increased risk of infection (this has been debated)

bull ascites

bull severe cardiopulmonary background disease

bull overlying residual barium in the GI tract from recent abdominal CT scan, lower GI series, etc



Patient Preparation Technique and potential complications of the procedure are discussed with the patient. Informed consent is obtained for ERCP, including likely therapeutic interventions. Formal consultation with gastroenterology staff is required prior to approval and scheduling. Patient is informed whether overnight hospitalization is necessary (most cases) or whether "same day" outpatient ERCP is feasible. On the day prior to the procedure, inpatient candidates are routinely seen by the endoscopist (or his representative) to briefly examine the patient, review details of the case, write orders, and answer remaining patient questions. Patient is made NPO after midnight (or at least 8 hours prior to study). Daily oral medications are permitted on the morning of ERCP with physician approval. Exceptions include antacids and CarafateŽ which may interfere with visualization of the mucosa. Aspirin products and nonsteroidal agents must be discontinued well in advance (at least 5 days for aspirin), especially if biopsy or sphincterotomy/papillotomy is anticipated. For hospital inpatients, dentures are removed and patient is transported to endoscopy suite on cart, accompanied by medical chart and relevant x-rays. For outpatients, procedure is the same except that transportation home must be arranged in advance if a "same day" procedure (driving not permitted due to sedative effects). Once patient is in the procedure room, baseline vital signs are recorded and an intravenous line started. Antibiotic prophylaxis may be given at this time (see Special Instructions). Premedications are routinely given including parenteral meperidine, diazepam, and often atropine (0.4 mg). A topical anesthetic agent such as CetacaineŽ spray is applied to the pharynx.

Aftercare The patient is placed at strict bedrest and observed carefully in the recovery area. Vital signs are monitored frequently and physician contacted if any complications arise. If the patient has tolerated the procedure well, he may be discharged from the testing area once sedatives have worn off. NPO until gag reflux has returned, then clear liquids for 24 hours. Any patient undergoing a therapeutic procedure should be observed overnight in the hospital. If a "same day" outpatient procedure (not allowed in all institutions), patient must have ready access to the hospital emergency room should complications develop.

Special Instructions Prior to ERCP, if bile duct obstruction is suspected, antibiotic coverage is usually indicated. If high grade bile duct or pancreatic duct obstruction is confirmed during ERCP, antibiotics should be continued (or begun). Individuals at risk for infective endocarditis are often given antibiotic prophylaxis prior to ERCP, particularly if a therapeutic maneuver such as sphincterotomy is planned. High risk cardiac lesions include rheumatic valvular disease, prosthetic valves, and prior endocarditis. However, ERCP is considered a relatively low risk procedure for the development of endocarditis, in comparison with invasive dental procedures and genitourinary tract instrumentation. Some authorities feel that prophylactic antibiotics are not warranted. A controlled clinical trial to answer this question is unlikely and liberal use of prophylactic antibiotics will probably continue.

Complications In the hands of a skilled endoscopist, diagnostic ERCP is associated with a 3% incidence of morbidity and 0.2% mortality, based on nationwide statistics.3 Complication rate is considerably higher with an inexperienced endoscopist. If endoscopic sphincterotomy or papillotomy is performed, overall morbidity rate increases to 8% and mortality 1% to 1.5%. Emergent surgical repair is necessary in 2%; it should be noted that these figures are superior to those documented for elective surgical exploration of the common bile duct.

Complications of ERCP may be classified as follows.

bull Painless hyperamylasemia: May occur in le75% of cases with sometimes striking elevations of serum and urine amylase levels. This is not accompanied by abdominal pain, nausea, or other stigmata of pancreatitis and is clinically inconsequential. Within 4 days, amylase decreases to normal without treatment.

bull Acute pancreatitis: Develops in 0.7% to 7.4% of cases and represents a small fraction of patients with elevated amylase levels. Pathogenesis is unclear. Implicated factors include the type of contrast used, the rate and volume of injection, the underlying condition of the pancreas, and the experience of the endoscopist. Management is the same as for gallstone or alcoholic pancreatitis.

bull Sepsis: A rare complication but associated with a high mortality. The incidence of bacteremia has been variously estimated at 0% to 14%. Both cholangitis (incidence of 0.65% to 0.8%) and pancreatic sepsis (0.3% incidence) have been reported. The former is almost exclusively associated with ductal obstruction. Biliary stasis predisposes patients to infection of bile fluid, and gram-negative bacteria probably remain dormant behind the obstruction until ERCP. Pancreatic sepsis appears more likely if a pseudocyst is present. Injection of nonsterile contrast into the pseudocyst may lead to abscess if drainage is sluggish. Some authorities consider the presence of pseudocyst a contraindication to ERCP but others feel the statistical risk is unproven.

bull Complications of upper endoscopy: Nonspecific complications common with upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (EGD) (see listing) including esophageal perforation, hypoxia, adverse drug reactions, arrhythmias. Drug toxicity may play a more significant role with ERCP due to lengthier procedure time requiring multiple drug administrations.

bull Instrumental injury: Uncommon with diagnostic ERCP alone unless anatomy is surgically distorted. Common therapeutic injuries are hemorrhage, laceration, and perforation.



Equipment The duodenoscope used for ERCP is similar to the fiberoptic endoscope used for EGD with several modifications. The viewing lens and light window at the instrument tip are arranged for side viewing. Within the duodenoscope is a channel which can accommodate a polyethylene contrast-filled catheter, which can be advanced past the tip of the instrument; this separate catheter is used for cannulating the papilla of vater. Other devices may be passed through the endoscope including biopsy forceps, electrocautery devices, sphincterotome, cytology brush, etc. A teaching head may be used for additional viewing or the endoscopic images may be videotaped on a television monitor.

Technique ERCP is performed with the patient on an x-ray table with radiologic equipment and fluoroscopy at hand. Following premedication the patient is placed in the left lateral decubitus position. The duodenoscope is passed by mouth through the anesthetized pharynx, and into the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum. A rapid visual examination of these segments may be made. Once the instrument has reached the second (descending) portion of the duodenum, the ampulla of vater is located, often on the medial wall. The periampullary region is carefully inspected. Often glucagon is given (0.2 mL doses) to decrease duodenal motility and facilitate visualization. The inner catheter (containing contrast dye) is then advanced from the lateral port of the endoscope and guided into the orifice. Once the ampulla has been engaged, the catheter is advanced several millimeters into the duct and a small volume of contrast injected. The dye filling pattern is observed under fluoroscopy ("the test shot") to determine orientation. In this manner the pancreatic duct and the bile duct may be selectively cannulated and imaged separately with contrast. Fluoroscopy is used as needed to assure proper catheter orientation. Formal spot radiographs are taken of contrast-filled ducts for the permanent record. At times x-ray table adjustments and patient repositioning may be necessary particularly if the gallbladder is imaged. Delayed films are also obtained following removal of the duodenoscope since contrast material normally remains in the ductal system for minutes. In addition, suspicious periampullary or ductal lesions may be biopsied and cytologic brush samples obtained. "Blind" biopsies of the ducts and/or pancreas may be taken at physician discretion. A variety of therapeutic procedures, mentioned earlier, may be performed.

Specimen Biopsy specimens and cytologic brushings are placed in appropriate containers and fixatives and sent to pathology laboratory without delay. Tissue for Gram's stain and culture is placed in a sterile jar without fixative and hand carried to the Microbiology Laboratory. Details of specimen collection, fixative, and transportation are handled by the gastroenterology team.

Turnaround Time Final report on biopsy and cytology specimen histology is given within 2-3 days (or longer in some cases).

Normal Findings Preliminary written report on endoscopic and radiologic findings immediately completed by gastroenterology staff. Final typewritten report is added to the chart in several days. A "normal cholangiogram" implies a normal radiographic appearance of the following structures: common bile duct (CBD), common hepatic duct, left and right hepatic duct (and subdivisions), cystic duct, and gallbladder. Maximum diameter of the normal CBD is approximately 9 mm (range 4-9 mm) providing the gallbladder is present. If the patient has had prior cholecystectomy, diameters may be somewhat increased. The CBD normally will have a tapered appearance at its distal end, the so-called "vaterian segment" where it is surrounded by the papilla and sphincter of Oddi. A "normal pancreatogram" implies a smooth, patent main pancreatic duct which gradually tapers from the body (diameter 3.4 mm) to the tail (1.7 mm). With optimal filling of the pancreatic duct, approximately 15-30 secondary branches will be outlined with contrast. These are straight in appearance and of fine caliber. There is variability in the anatomy of the pancreatic ducts. For example, the duct of Santorini is present in 80% of normal individuals and its communication with the duodenum or main pancreatic duct is variable.

Critical Values In formulating the diagnostic impression, information is obtained from three sources: direct visual examination, radiologic imaging, and biopsy specimens. Endoscopic examination of the papilla of vater may reveal a mucosal mass if carcinoma of the pancreatic head is present. Other malignancies may involve this region including ampullary carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and rarely duodenal cancers. The endoscopic appearance of the papilla may be highly suggestive in other disease states, such as papilla "bulging" (possible impacted stone), edema, erythema, and patency (recently passed stone), visible purulent drainage (suppurative cholangitis), bright red blood through the orifice (hemobilia). Radiologic abnormalities in the cholangiogram may be specific and diagnostic. Certainly, retained stones in the common bile duct are easily recognized by discrete filling defects. Other deviations include biliary strictures, irregular filling defects or mass lesions beyond endoscopic visualization (carcinoma), ductal dilatation (obstruction of any cause), irregular intrahepatic ducts with strictures and ectasia (sclerosing cholangitis), cystic duct narrowing with cholelithiasis (acute cholecystitis). The pancreatogram may reveal congenital abnormalities (such as pancreas divisum), small pancreatic pseudocysts (not seen on CT scan), and pancreatic duct calculi. The radiologic appearance of carcinoma of the pancreas includes:

bull single, irregular abrupt stricture of the pancreatic duct (probably the best criteria4)

bull gradual occlusion of the main duct

bull alterations in the side branches near the tumor such as fragmentation and cystic destruction

bull displacement of Wirsung's duct

bull pooled contrast material in an irregular manner (within necrotic tumor)

bull strictured CBD and pancreatic duct ("double duct" sign)

The radiologic appearance of chronic pancreatitis may closely resemble pancreatic cancer. However, the main pancreatic duct in chronic pancreatitis is classically irregular, tortuous, and with multiple stenoses - the "chain of lakes" appearance. Single smooth stenosis is also more consistent with chronic pancreatitis.4 The yield of biopsy in pancreatic cancer is >90% in most large series. Nearly all pancreatic malignancies are ductal carcinomas; thus even small lesions are likely to cause stenosis or occlusion of the main pancreatic duct. In cases where tumor invades the pancreatic duct region or ampulla without entering the lumen, cytology specimens of pancreatic juice may be diagnostic.

Limitations ERCP is relatively expensive and hazardous in comparison with other endoscopic procedures. Results are highly operator dependent, as demonstrated in large series. For both physician and patient there may be nontrivial radiation exposure if fluoroscopy time is prolonged. This procedure is technically difficult, particularly in patients who have had a Billroth II gastrectomy and gastrojejunostomy.

Footnotes

1. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Utilization Committee, Appropriate Use of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Manchester, MA: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1986.

2. Vennes JA, "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,"Cecil Textbook of Medicine, 18th ed, Chapter 96, Wyngaarden JB and Smith LH, eds, Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co, 1988, 668-74.

3. Shahmir M and Schuman BM, "Complications of Fiberoptic Endoscopy,"Gastrointest Endosc, 1980, 26:86-91.

4. Cello JP, "Carcinoma of the Pancreas,"Gastrointestinal Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, 4th ed, Chapter 99, Sleisenger MH and Fordtran JS, eds, Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co, 1989, 1872-80.



References

Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, et al, "Complications of ERCP: A Study of 10,000 Cases,"Gastroenterology, 1976, 70:314-20.

Dutta SK, Cox M, Williams RB, et al, "Prospective Evaluation of the Risk of Bacteremia and the Role of Antibiotics in ERCP,"J Clin Gastroenterol, 1983, 5:325-9.

Geenen JE and Venu RP, "Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography,"Bockus Gastroenterology, 4th ed, Chapter 44, Berk JE, ed, Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co, 1985, 601-11.

Sivak MV and Sullivan BH, "Endoscopic Retrograde Pancreatography: Analysis of the Normal Pancreatogram,"Am J Dig Dis, 1976, 21:263-9.

Stewart ET, Vennes JA, and Geenen JE, Atlas of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, St Louis, MO: CV Mosby Co, 1977.

Venu RP, Geenen JE, Toouli J, et al, "Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Diagnosis of Cholelithiasis in Patients With Normal Gallbladder X-ray and Ultrasound Studies,"JAMA, 1983, 249:758-61.

Back to the articles...