|
[previous]
[next] [question list] |
| T o p i c : Colonoscopy
for 78 yr. old on coumadin |
| . |
| Q: Following
a Barium Enema study my 78 yr old father was told he needs a colonoscopy to biopsy a cecal
lesion.("No significant abnormalities were found despite adquate distention of
the ileocecal valve.") My father had a heart valve replacement 1 1/2 years ago.
He also has diabetes and chronically high blood pressure.The study was done because my
father complained of constipation. Do the benefit of the colonoscopy outweigh the risks in
this case? |
| . |
| A: Sorry, risk/benefit ratio is a very complex judgment that can only be made
by the consulting physician. Some heart valve replacements require chronic anticoagulation
therapy to prevent blood clots. Besides the risks inherent in the procedure,
the act of stopping and restarting anticoagulation therapy can be associated with blood
clots and stroke. The consulting physician must weigh the relative risk of the
procedure against the level of suspicion that there is a real and potentially treatable
problem (?benign polyp versus benign prominent normal ileocecal valve versus a malignant
(cancerous) lesion. Other aspects of the medical evaluation may lend support to the
concern about future risk including the presence of blood in the stool or anemia (low
blood count- hemoglobin).Ultimately, decisions such as these relate not only to the
individual's health, but the personal preferences for preventive care and the individual's
tolerance for risk (risk of the procedure, risk of a serious undiagnosed problem leading
to other complications such as hemorrhage or risk of cancer not being detected early
enough). If a patient requires anticoagulation then the risk of future serious
bleeding complications is greater. |
|